Safeguarding is an increasingly important area of community care law, and exists to ensure that people are being properly cared for and protected from harm, exploitation or manipulation. However, it can also be extremely complex. Here, our community care law team answer some of the most frequently asked questions about safeguarding vulnerable adults.
The Care Act 2014 brought in legal provisions for safeguarding vulnerable adults and adults at risk for the first time. Each Local Authority now has a Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB) consisting of Social Services, the NHS and the Police. Safeguarding Plans and annual progress reports should be published annually. If Social Services reasonably suspect that an adult with care and support needs is at risk of abuse or neglect, then Social Services or the other members of the SAB must make enquiries to establish if any action is required.
All Local Authorities should follow the Best Interest principles set out in the Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice. The decision-maker should always arrive at a decision that is the least restrictive intervention possible for the vulnerable adult, balancing this with an assessment of risk.
An adult who:
i) Has needs for care and support (whether or not the LA is meeting those needs)
ii) Is experiencing or is at risk of abuse or neglect
iii) As a result of those care and support needs, is unable to protect themselves from either the risk of or the experience of abuse or neglect
Best Interest generally refers to a method for making decisions that aims to be more objective than the old subjective test used by Health & Social Services practitioners. It requires the decision maker to think what the best course of action is for the person and should not be the personal views of the decision maker. The meeting gives family members the chance to express the prior wishes and religious and cultural influences that need to be taken into account when deciding on the issue that is affecting the vulnerable adult. Best Interest decisions should only be taken in relation to specific decisions that an individual lack mental capacity to decide for themselves.
Social Services can inform people that they have reason to believe that there has been neglect, harm or abuse to an adult at risk and that a safeguardinginquiry has been started. The safeguarding alert may be related to:
While of course it is vital that statutory agencies actively investigate any potentialsafeguarding issues that affect vulnerable adults, sometimes the approach adopted by Social Services can sometimes be clumsy and can leave the genuinely motivated family member (who has at worst made a few mistakes) feeling criminalised but with no right to reply. Often this is in the context of not getting the support that they need in order to fulfill their caring role from Health and Social Services. In some cases, the ‘person of concern’ is not even told what the allegations are.
Unfortunately there are people with caring responsibilities who purposely take advantage of a vulnerable adult in the ways mentioned above. Those people who are acting in their own best interests rather than the vulnerable adult’s best interests should be held to account and the abuse should be stopped. Because of this, Health and Social Services have to be vigilant in dealing with safeguarding alerts. This means that all safeguarding alerts should be investigated and processes should be followed in order for Health and Social Services to ascertain whether there are things that need to change, or whether the initial concerns are unfounded.
The way that some cases are handled is not always proportionate to the risk that may exist. However on some occasions of course the opposite may be true.Safeguarding investigations can result for example in any of the following:
A family member or carer who is facing an investigation can be supported and advised through the process and represented at a Best Interest meeting. We often find it is possible to resolve the dispute in a way that allows Social Services to feel confident that the vulnerable individual is properly protected, that they have done their duty and that the previous living and caring arrangements can be resumed, perhaps with additional support and some checks and balances for an initial period. We find that when the carer is supported and is able to understand the essential principles of mental capacity and best interest decision making, they are better able to work effectively and in partnership with statutory organisations. If Court of Protection cannot be avoided, then your solicitor can represent you.
The difficulty is that people quite naturally panic or become defensive when they understand that they are subject to a safeguarding investigation. We argue that the best thing is for all parties to adopt more of a partnership approach and to recognise the need for conciliation. It is easy to see how disputes can escalate in what are often highly emotionally charged situations. Your solicitor will encourage you to be constructive and open when it comes to dealing with the safeguarding process. If you feel that the case is stacked against you then of course your solicitor will help you and advise you as to how to work with safeguarding professionals and safeguarding systems. Your solicitor may be able to attend the Best Interest decision-meeting with you, to help you get your points across to the decision maker.
You should talk to a specialist legal adviser about the option of applying to the Court of Protection, so that an experienced Judge can review the case and determine what is in the vulnerable adult’s Best Interests.
If you seek advice on Safeguarding and Best Interest Decision Making, our community care law team can help you.